Love or Logic. That seems to be the question of the day. Each has its own pros and cons, and the world could not exactly run solely on one or the other. After all, love did not show you how to file your taxes nor remind you to stop at that last red light. But then again, was logic the driving factor when you bought a sweater for your dog or when your lover called you out of the blue? And yet, the question remains. When it comes time to make a decision, is it your mind or your heart that you rely on for the answer?
A lot of people like to proclaim that they turn to logic, and in many cases, they probably do. When you chose to move away from your extended family in order to pursue your career, you were acting logically. When you joined a gym to better your health despite the short-term pain it would cause, there was most likely some logic involved in the decision. But I would also like to suggest that many times we apply logic after the decision has already been made in order to mask the fact that our actions are emotionally based. Joining the gym will improve your health, yes, but your original motivation for signing up was because you wanted to meet new people or you think that maybe your spouse will be more attracted to you if you are in shape or you need a challenge. Going to the gym may be the logical solution to each of these issues, but that doesn’t make the desire to join a gym logical. What it does is make logic the solution to emotion.
But what do you do when your logic contradicts your emotions? I’ve found that this is not as divided along the gender line as you would think. Although girls are more likely to let their emotions dictate their actions, the majority of people will tell you “it depends”. Do you get back together with the person who cheated on you, when logic tells you that they shouldn’t be trusted? It depends. It’s funny to me how so many people claim to be logical, yet when you ask about a specific circumstance, the answer is always “it depends”. When did emotions get such a bad rep? What is it about emotions that are so shameful that while you can admit to having them, you can’t actually base your decisions on them?
My problem with emotions is that they can be fleeting and have the potential to make you look stupid. There is nothing predictable about emotions; nothing stable. Depending on his mood, your boss could be delighted with your performance today and despise it tomorrow. The quality of your work has not changed; only his mood has. Emotions also aren’t sensitive to cultural norms. Anyone who has ever felt the need to cry at work or throw a tantrum in the middle of a checkout lane knows what I mean. We are told to express our emotions but aren’t often encouraged to act on them. For years I thought I had found a loophole to the whole emotion problem. I knew emotions weren’t completely avoidable, so I would allow myself to have them but limited how deep they could go. I would have friends that I cared for, but would only get attached to a point. There would be people that I trusted, but not with everything. Logically, it doesn’t make sense to trust everyone, and so instead of taking the risk of picking the wrong person to trust, I trusted everyone as little as possible. Because that’s what emotions are: risky. Opening yourself to emotions also means making yourself vulnerable. You never hear of someone’s logic getting hurt, only their feelings.
This brings me back to the love/logic conflict. How do you know when it is worth the risk to let your emotions overrule what is logical? I know I write a lot of emails and not all of them are worth replying to, but I would really like to hear people’s thoughts on this. All I ask is that you try to avoid telling me “it depends.”
Everyone, meet Murphy.